- 16GB DDR4 · 500GB SSD
- Actively cooled
Not by much, and not everywhere. The N100 and N95 share four cores and a 3.4GHz turbo; the N95 gets a higher power rating and a faster, narrower iGPU, while the N97 beats both on graphics.
Updated September 2026Pick the N100 for a box that runs all day, sips power and stays quiet: its 6W rating suits servers, firewalls and fanless cases. Pick the N95 if the N95 box comes with more memory or storage for the same money, since everyday speed is a near tie. Pick an N97 box whenever one turns up at the same price, because it is faster than both.
Intel launched the N95, N97 and N100 together in early 2023 as Alder Lake-N chips. All three have four Gracemont efficiency cores, no Hyper-Threading, 6MB of cache and the same single-channel memory controller.
On the CPU side the N95 and N100 are rated identically: 3.4GHz maximum turbo on the same core design. The N97 runs 200MHz higher at 3.6GHz. Everything else that separates them sits in two lines of the spec sheet.
Everything a buyer touches is the same across the three. They take DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 or LPDDR5-4800, with 16GB as Intel's official maximum. They offer nine PCIe 3.0 lanes, the same media engine for AV1, HEVC, VP9 and H.264 decoding, and the same virtualisation support for Proxmox or ESXi.
So the fair question is not which chip is newer, since none is. It is which trade you prefer: a lower power ceiling with wider graphics, or a higher power ceiling with a faster, narrower iGPU. The answer depends on what the box will do all day.
| Spec | N95 | N100 | N97 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Max turbo | 3.4GHz | 3.4GHz | 3.6GHz |
| Cache | 6MB | 6MB | 6MB |
| Processor base power | 15W | 6W | 12W |
| Graphics units (EUs) | 16 | 24 | 24 |
| Max graphics clock | 1.2GHz | 750MHz | 1.2GHz |
| Memory | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | Same | Same |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Official max memory | 16GB | 16GB | 16GB |
| Launched | Q1 2023 | Q1 2023 | Q1 2023 |
From Intel's published product specifications. All three are Alder Lake-N chips built on the Intel 7 process.
Base power is the load a chip is designed to hold indefinitely. At 15W the N95 is built to keep all four cores nearer their turbo for longer than the 6W N100.
In practice the box maker sets the real limits in the BIOS. Many N100 boxes let the chip run well above 6W for sustained work, and some N95 boxes are tuned conservatively. That is why two published benchmark runs of the same chip can disagree, and why the N95 and N100 often land close together.
Where the rating shows is heat and noise. A higher sustained limit means more heat to move, so N95 boxes lean on fans, while fanless designs mostly use the N100. A 6W chip is the one that suits a sealed case in a cupboard.
A machine switched on 24 hours a day spends most of those hours idle or near it. That keeps the running-cost difference small either way. The idle and load wattage figures for N100 boxes show where the power goes.
Multiply execution units by clock and the two iGPUs land within about 7% of each other: 24 units at 750MHz against 16 units at 1.2GHz. On paper the N95 is a hair ahead.
Real results depend on memory bandwidth as much as on the GPU. Both chips share one memory channel, so a box with DDR4-3200 starves either iGPU sooner than a box with LPDDR5-4800. Picking the right memory type moves graphics speed more than picking between these two chips.
The N97 is a different story. It pairs the N100's 24 units with the N95's 1.2GHz clock, which works out to roughly 60% more raw graphics throughput than the N100 on the same arithmetic. That shows in light games, emulation and a busy 4K desktop.
For play, the N100 gaming and emulation breakdown gives the baseline. Add a modest step for the N95 in a well-cooled box, and a clear step for the N97.
The M10 pairs the N100 with 12GB of LPDDR5-4800, which feeds the 24 graphics units faster than DDR4-3200 can. It adds Wi-Fi 6, two HDMI 2.0 outputs and a 2.5G RJ45 port in a palm-sized case.
See today’s priceOf the three 2023 chips, the N97 is the strongest on paper. It has the highest turbo at 3.6GHz, the full 24 graphics units at 1.2GHz, and a 12W rating that sits between the other two.
It never became as common as the N100. Makers built it into fewer mini PCs, and the refresh cycle moved many of those designs to the Twin Lake N150 and N250 in 2025. N97 boxes are still around, just in far smaller numbers than N100 boxes.
That last comparison is the one that matters now. The N150 gets within a step of the N97's graphics at half the power rating, and turns up in far more boxes. A full breakdown sits in N100 against N150 and N200.
If an N97 box and an N100 box have the same memory, storage and ports, take the N97. If the N100 box offers 16GB where the N97 box has 8GB, take the N100, because memory runs out long before the extra clock pays off.
Beelink Mini S12 Pro |
Beelink Mini S12 (N100) |
Beelink Mini S12 (Intel N95) |
BOSGAME E3 Neo (Intel N95) |
GMKtec G3S (Intel N95) | |
| Type | Mini PC | Mini PC | Mini PC | Mini PC | Mini PC |
| Memory | 16GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 | 8GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 | 8GB |
| Storage | 500GB SSD | 500GB SSD | — | 512GB SSD | 256GB SSD |
| Cooling | Fan | Fan | Fan | Fan | Fan |
| Wireless | — | — | Wi-Fi 5 | — | — |
| See today’s price | See today’s price | See today’s price | See today’s price | See today’s price |
Beelink sold the Mini S12 with an N95 and the Mini S12 Pro with an N100, which makes the pair a clean test of the chip question. The difference between the configurations is larger than the difference between the processors.
The N95 Mini S12 comes with 8GB of DDR4 and a 480GB SATA SSD, Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 4.2. The N100 S12 Pro comes with 16GB of DDR4, a 500GB M.2 SSD, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.2, four 10Gbps USB ports and a 2.5G LAN port.
For almost any buyer that makes the S12 Pro the better machine. Doubling memory helps more than any chip gap in this family, and the faster wireless and USB are extras on top. The N95 version makes sense only at a clearly lower price, and only for single-task use.
Rule of thumb: compare boxes at the same memory size first, then let the chip break the tie. At equal configuration, pick the N100 for low heat and quiet, the N95 for a bit more sustained speed.
They are close. Both have four cores and a 3.4GHz turbo; the N100 runs at a 6W rating with 24 graphics units, the N95 at 15W with 16 faster graphics units. The N100 is better for fanless and always-on boxes, the N95 slightly better at long heavy loads.
Power rating and graphics. The N95 is rated 15W and has 16 execution units at up to 1.2GHz; the N100 is rated 6W and has 24 execution units at up to 750MHz.
Yes. It has a 3.6GHz turbo and 24 graphics units at 1.2GHz, against 3.4GHz and 750MHz on the N100, at a 12W rating.
Only under sustained load, and only if the box maker lets it. At idle, where an always-on box spends most of its time, the two draw about the same.
Neither has an edge. Both use the same Quick Sync media engine for hardware transcoding, including HEVC and AV1 decoding.