- 16GB DDR4 · 500GB SSD
- Actively cooled
The N150 is the N100 with higher clocks, and the N200 is the N100 with more graphics units. All three share a 6W power rating, one memory channel and a 16GB official ceiling, so the box around the chip often matters more than the chip.
Updated September 2026Pick the N150 if its box costs the same as the N100 version or only a little more: it is the same design with 200MHz more CPU turbo and a 1.0GHz graphics clock. Pick the N100 if it is noticeably cheaper, because for office work, streaming and a home server the difference rarely shows.
Intel launched the N150 in early 2025 under the Twin Lake name, two years after the N100. It keeps the same four Gracemont efficiency cores, the same 6MB cache, the same 6W base power and the same single memory channel.
What changed is the clocks. CPU turbo rises from 3.4GHz to 3.6GHz, and the graphics clock from 750MHz to 1.0GHz on the same 24 execution units. Nothing else in the specification sheet moves.
That makes the N150 a speed bin, not a new architecture. Software that runs on one runs identically on the other, including Proxmox, OPNsense, Home Assistant OS and Windows 11. Drivers are shared too, so a Linux kernel that knows the N100's graphics knows the N150's.
The N200 is the odd one out. It is an Alder Lake-N chip from the N100's own 2023 launch, with a 3.7GHz turbo and 32 graphics units instead of 24. Makers put it mostly in laptops and a smaller number of mini PCs, which is why it shows up in searches but rarely on shelves.
| Spec | N100 | N150 | N200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Alder Lake-N | Twin Lake | Alder Lake-N |
| Launched | Q1 2023 | Q1 2025 | Q1 2023 |
| Cores / threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Max turbo | 3.4GHz | 3.6GHz | 3.7GHz |
| Cache | 6MB | 6MB | 6MB |
| Processor base power | 6W | 6W | 6W |
| Graphics units (EUs) | 24 | 24 | 32 |
| Max graphics clock | 750MHz | 1.0GHz | 750MHz |
| Memory | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800, one channel | Same | Same |
| Official max memory | 16GB | 16GB | 16GB |
| PCIe 3.0 lanes | 9 | 9 | 9 |
From Intel's published product specifications. Real clocks under load depend on the power limits each maker sets in the BIOS.
Divide the numbers and the N150's turbo is about 6% higher than the N100's, while its graphics clock is a third higher. Those are ceilings, not guarantees.
A four-core chip rated at 6W spends most of its working life below maximum turbo. How close it gets depends on the sustained power limit the box maker programs, and on how well the cooler holds temperature. A generous N100 box can outrun a tightly limited N150 box.
For single-threaded work, the extra 200MHz shows up as slightly faster page loads and app launches. You would struggle to tell them apart in a browser. In multi-core work like compressing files or compiling code, the gap stays in the same single-digit range, because both chips hit the same power wall.
Media decoding is not one of those places. Both chips carry the same fixed-function decoders for AV1, HEVC, VP9 and H.264. A 4K stream plays identically on either, and a Plex or Jellyfin server transcodes through the same Quick Sync hardware. Idle power is also effectively the same, since the silicon and the base power rating did not change.
Search for N100 against N200 and the answer is mostly about graphics. The N200 has 32 execution units at 750MHz, against the N100's 24 at the same clock.
That is a third more graphics hardware, landing in roughly the same place as the N150's higher clock by a different route. On the CPU side the N200 turbo is 3.7GHz, 300MHz above the N100.
The catch is supply. N200 mini PCs are scarce next to the N100 and N150, and many older N200 designs have given way to N150 or N250 versions. At an N100 price, an N200 box is a fair buy for media or light play.
What the N100's iGPU can run in games carries over to the N150 and N200, each a small step up.
The non-Pro Mini S12 carries the same 16GB and 500GB class of configuration, four 10Gbps USB ports, two HDMI 2.0 outputs and a 2.5G LAN port. Compare it with the S13 when you want the cheapest route to Beelink's layout.
See today’s priceThe cleanest way to compare the chips is inside one brand's layout. Beelink sells the N100 Mini S12 Pro and the N150 Mini S13 in the same 16GB and 500GB class of configuration.
On paper that isolates the processor. The S12 Pro ships with four 10Gbps USB ports, two HDMI 4K@60Hz outputs, Wi-Fi 6 and a 2.5G LAN port. The S13's stated configuration is 16GB DDR4, a 500GB M.2 SSD and 4K output; confirm its port layout on Beelink's spec sheet before assuming it copies the S12 Pro.
Beelink markets the S13 as an upgraded N100. That is fair: it is the same class of machine one chip generation on, not a different product.
What separates them in practice is age and price. The S12 Pro has been around longer, so its firmware, Linux quirks and memory compatibility are well mapped by owners. The S13 is newer and gets the same treatment over time.
The S12 Pro and the plain S12 differ in more than the name; Beelink's N100 range breaks down the versions sold under each.
Beelink Mini S12 Pro |
Beelink Mini S13 (Intel N150) |
Beelink Mini S12 (N100) |
MOREFINE M10 | |
| Type | Mini PC | Mini PC | Mini PC | Mini PC |
| Memory | 16GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 | 12GB LPDDR5 |
| Storage | 500GB SSD | 500GB SSD | 500GB SSD | — |
| Cooling | Fan | Fan | Fan | Fan |
| Wireless | — | Wi-Fi 6 | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| See today’s price | See today’s price | See today’s price | See today’s price |
Across real configurations, the chip is rarely the deciding line. Memory type, storage, network ports and cooling vary far more from box to box than the processor does.
Use the chip name as a tie-breaker, not a starting point. A box with 16GB, a 2.5GbE port and two M.2 slots is a better home server on an N100 than an 8GB, gigabit, single-slot box on an N150.
One more check: some boxes keep N100 in the product name after switching to the N150, or the reverse. Trust the specification lines and the model name, and if they disagree, ask the maker before ordering. The N100 spec sheet, line by line, shows what else to verify.
Yes, slightly. Its CPU turbo is 3.6GHz against 3.4GHz, and its graphics clock is 1.0GHz against 750MHz, with the same four cores, 6W base power and memory support.
Not in any way you would measure at the wall. Both carry a 6W base power rating from Intel; real draw depends on the power limits the box maker sets.
The N200 has 32 graphics units against 24, so it is the better pick for light gaming or several screens. For servers, firewalls and office work the N100 does the same job.
No. Both chips are soldered to the board, so the processor cannot be swapped.
Yes: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 or LPDDR5-4800 on one channel, with 16GB as Intel's official maximum.