Top picks

N100 vs N150 Mini PC, Plus the N200: Which Chip to Pay For

The N150 is the N100 with higher clocks, and the N200 is the N100 with more graphics units. All three share a 6W power rating, one memory channel and a 16GB official ceiling, so the box around the chip often matters more than the chip.

Updated September 2026
Verdict

Pick the N150 if its box costs the same as the N100 version or only a little more: it is the same design with 200MHz more CPU turbo and a 1.0GHz graphics clock. Pick the N100 if it is noticeably cheaper, because for office work, streaming and a home server the difference rarely shows.

  • N150: slightly faster everywhere, same power, same memory limits
  • N100: the most-sold and best-documented chip, fine for almost every job
  • N200: more graphics units, worth it only for light gaming or a busy screen setup

The N150 is a Twin Lake refresh with 200MHz more turbo

Intel launched the N150 in early 2025 under the Twin Lake name, two years after the N100. It keeps the same four Gracemont efficiency cores, the same 6MB cache, the same 6W base power and the same single memory channel.

What changed is the clocks. CPU turbo rises from 3.4GHz to 3.6GHz, and the graphics clock from 750MHz to 1.0GHz on the same 24 execution units. Nothing else in the specification sheet moves.

That makes the N150 a speed bin, not a new architecture. Software that runs on one runs identically on the other, including Proxmox, OPNsense, Home Assistant OS and Windows 11. Drivers are shared too, so a Linux kernel that knows the N100's graphics knows the N150's.

  • Same socket class: both are soldered BGA parts, so no board takes either chip as an upgrade.
  • Same memory rules: one SO-DIMM or soldered LPDDR5, 16GB official, 32GB widely reported to work.
  • Same I/O budget: nine PCIe 3.0 lanes, which caps how many NICs, SSDs and SATA ports a maker can hang off either one.

The N200 is the odd one out. It is an Alder Lake-N chip from the N100's own 2023 launch, with a 3.7GHz turbo and 32 graphics units instead of 24. Makers put it mostly in laptops and a smaller number of mini PCs, which is why it shows up in searches but rarely on shelves.

Data

N100, N150 and N200 side by side

SpecN100N150N200
FamilyAlder Lake-NTwin LakeAlder Lake-N
LaunchedQ1 2023Q1 2025Q1 2023
Cores / threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
Max turbo3.4GHz3.6GHz3.7GHz
Cache6MB6MB6MB
Processor base power6W6W6W
Graphics units (EUs)242432
Max graphics clock750MHz1.0GHz750MHz
MemoryDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800, one channelSameSame
Official max memory16GB16GB16GB
PCIe 3.0 lanes999

From Intel's published product specifications. Real clocks under load depend on the power limits each maker sets in the BIOS.

The CPU clock gap is 6%, the graphics gap 33%

Divide the numbers and the N150's turbo is about 6% higher than the N100's, while its graphics clock is a third higher. Those are ceilings, not guarantees.

A four-core chip rated at 6W spends most of its working life below maximum turbo. How close it gets depends on the sustained power limit the box maker programs, and on how well the cooler holds temperature. A generous N100 box can outrun a tightly limited N150 box.

For single-threaded work, the extra 200MHz shows up as slightly faster page loads and app launches. You would struggle to tell them apart in a browser. In multi-core work like compressing files or compiling code, the gap stays in the same single-digit range, because both chips hit the same power wall.

Where the N150 earns its keep: the graphics clock. Light games, browser video with heavy effects and a pair of 4K screens all lean on the iGPU, and a 33% higher clock on the same 24 units is the one change you can notice.

Media decoding is not one of those places. Both chips carry the same fixed-function decoders for AV1, HEVC, VP9 and H.264. A 4K stream plays identically on either, and a Plex or Jellyfin server transcodes through the same Quick Sync hardware. Idle power is also effectively the same, since the silicon and the base power rating did not change.

Chart

Graphics clock: 750 vs 1,000MHz

Maximum graphics clock from Intel's specifications. The N200 compensates with 32 execution units instead of 24.

The N200 adds eight graphics units on the same 6W

Search for N100 against N200 and the answer is mostly about graphics. The N200 has 32 execution units at 750MHz, against the N100's 24 at the same clock.

That is a third more graphics hardware, landing in roughly the same place as the N150's higher clock by a different route. On the CPU side the N200 turbo is 3.7GHz, 300MHz above the N100.

  • Pick an N200 box for light gaming, emulation up to the PS2 era, or three screens of busy dashboards.
  • Skip it for a firewall, a NAS or Home Assistant, where the graphics sit idle and the extra EUs buy nothing.
  • Check the memory: more EUs want more bandwidth, and a single DDR4-3200 channel can starve them where LPDDR5-4800 would not.

The catch is supply. N200 mini PCs are scarce next to the N100 and N150, and many older N200 designs have given way to N150 or N250 versions. At an N100 price, an N200 box is a fair buy for media or light play.

What the N100's iGPU can run in games carries over to the N150 and N200, each a small step up.

Standout

The N100 that makes the N150 hard to justify

Beelink Mini S12 (N100)
Best for a plain N100 desk box Beelink Mini S12 (N100)

The non-Pro Mini S12 carries the same 16GB and 500GB class of configuration, four 10Gbps USB ports, two HDMI 2.0 outputs and a 2.5G LAN port. Compare it with the S13 when you want the cheapest route to Beelink's layout.

See today’s price

Same 16GB, same maker: the Mini S12 Pro against the Mini S13

The cleanest way to compare the chips is inside one brand's layout. Beelink sells the N100 Mini S12 Pro and the N150 Mini S13 in the same 16GB and 500GB class of configuration.

On paper that isolates the processor. The S12 Pro ships with four 10Gbps USB ports, two HDMI 4K@60Hz outputs, Wi-Fi 6 and a 2.5G LAN port. The S13's stated configuration is 16GB DDR4, a 500GB M.2 SSD and 4K output; confirm its port layout on Beelink's spec sheet before assuming it copies the S12 Pro.

Beelink markets the S13 as an upgraded N100. That is fair: it is the same class of machine one chip generation on, not a different product.

What separates them in practice is age and price. The S12 Pro has been around longer, so its firmware, Linux quirks and memory compatibility are well mapped by owners. The S13 is newer and gets the same treatment over time.

  1. Compare the two at the same memory and storage size, not the cheapest version of each.
  2. If the S13 is within a small margin, take it for the graphics clock.
  3. If the S12 Pro is clearly cheaper, spend the difference on a bigger SSD instead.

The S12 Pro and the plain S12 differ in more than the name; Beelink's N100 range breaks down the versions sold under each.

Spec by spec

Four boxes, two chips: N100 and N150 configurations

Beelink Mini S12 Pro Beelink Mini S12 Pro Beelink Mini S13 (Intel N150) Beelink Mini S13 (Intel N150) Beelink Mini S12 (N100) Beelink Mini S12 (N100) MOREFINE M10 MOREFINE M10
TypeMini PCMini PCMini PCMini PC
Memory16GB DDR416GB DDR416GB DDR412GB LPDDR5
Storage500GB SSD500GB SSD500GB SSD—
CoolingFanFanFanFan
Wireless—Wi-Fi 6—Wi-Fi 6
See today’s price See today’s price See today’s price See today’s price
Hardware

Full specs, top three

Beelink Mini S12 Pro
Beelink Mini S12 Pro
Processor
Intel N100 (12th Gen Alder Lake-N), 4 cores / 4 threads, up to 3.4GHz
Cache
6MB
Graphics
Intel UHD Graphics, up to 750MHz
Memory
16GB DDR4
Storage
500GB M.2 SSD (512GB on some versions)
Video out
2× HDMI, up to 4K@60Hz each
USB
4× USB 3.2 Gen2 (10Gbps)
Ethernet
1× 2.5G RJ45
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth
5.2
Audio
3.5mm combo headphone/mic jack
Power input
DC jack, external adapter
Read the review →See today’s price

Pay for the N150 only when the price gap is small

Across real configurations, the chip is rarely the deciding line. Memory type, storage, network ports and cooling vary far more from box to box than the processor does.

Use the chip name as a tie-breaker, not a starting point. A box with 16GB, a 2.5GbE port and two M.2 slots is a better home server on an N100 than an 8GB, gigabit, single-slot box on an N150.

  • Home server, NAS, Home Assistant: either chip. Buy on ports and drive slots; see the homelab guide.
  • Office desk and browsing: either chip. Buy on memory, 16GB first.
  • Media box behind a TV: either chip for playback; the N150 for a smoother interface on a 4K screen.
  • Light gaming and emulation: N150 or N200, ideally with LPDDR5.
  • Firewall: either chip; NIC quality matters more. Several N100 firewall appliances now ship with the N150 anyway.

One more check: some boxes keep N100 in the product name after switching to the N150, or the reverse. Trust the specification lines and the model name, and if they disagree, ask the maker before ordering. The N100 spec sheet, line by line, shows what else to verify.

FAQ

Asked often

Is the N150 faster than the N100?

Yes, slightly. Its CPU turbo is 3.6GHz against 3.4GHz, and its graphics clock is 1.0GHz against 750MHz, with the same four cores, 6W base power and memory support.

Does the N150 use more power than the N100?

Not in any way you would measure at the wall. Both carry a 6W base power rating from Intel; real draw depends on the power limits the box maker sets.

N100 or N200 for a mini PC?

The N200 has 32 graphics units against 24, so it is the better pick for light gaming or several screens. For servers, firewalls and office work the N100 does the same job.

Can I upgrade an N100 mini PC to an N150?

No. Both chips are soldered to the board, so the processor cannot be swapped.

Do the N100 and N150 support the same memory?

Yes: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 or LPDDR5-4800 on one channel, with 16GB as Intel's official maximum.

Read next

More N100 reading

Shortlist

Other boxes to weigh

Other chips

Same class, different chip

N95 and N150 boxes that sell alongside the N100. Same four-core family, different clocks and power limits.